Sunday, August 02, 2009


Revenues soar for UK banks

Results expected to raise fresh concern over return of bonus culture


Barclays and HSBC are tomorrow expected to demonstrate it is "business as usual" again in the City by reporting bumper revenues in their investment banking divisions that could unleash big bonuses for top bankers.


Barclays bank eagle logo

Investment banking division of Barclays expected to report record revenues. Photograph: Martin Godwin


Barclays will be the first of the high street banks to report first half figures tomorrow when its investment banking division is expected to report record revenues that will translate into bigger bonuses for the 20,000 staff of the operation.

It will revive controversy over excessive pay in the City, where a culture of linking reckless risk-taking to huge bonuses was blamed for the financial crisis which has led Britain and the world into recession.

But despite threats by the government and regulators to rein in excessive pay as the price for pumping billions of pounds of taxpayers money to prop up the banking system at the height of the crisis last autumn, no new curbs have been put in place and no legislation is planned.

Lib Dem Treasury spokesman Vince Cable said the situation was "appalling".

"Without the taxpayer, many bankers would be without a job let alone a huge bonus. Their greed and excess risk taking led to this crisis which is now costing millions their jobs and many their homes," Cable said.

The Centre for Economic and Business Research thinktank estimates that up to £4bn will be paid out this year by banks, up from £3.3 billion. Billions more will also be paid out in shares.

Barclays Capital – run by Bob Diamond, the US banker who earned £17m last year – has expanded rapidly since taking over the Wall Street operations of the collapsed Lehman Brothers last September, and many US staff of the bankrupt Wall Street bank stand to enjoy the bonus payouts.

At Barclays, bonuses dropped 40% a year ago but now look likely to rise again – average payouts for the first six months of the year for staff at Barclays Capital arm are on course to be more than £100,000.

Less than a year after taxpayer money was pumped into the financial system to stop banks collapsing, those banks with major investment banking operations are benefiting from a reduction in competition, fees earned from governments raising money on the bond markets, and companies raising funds with new shares.

HSBC, also reporting tomorrow, is also expected to benefit, as is RBS, 70% owned by the taxpayer, which reports on Friday.

Cable called on the Financial Services Authority, which has a new responsibly to oversee pay deals, to act quickly.

"Instead of allowing a return to business as usual, the FSA must show some real teeth and force the banks to publish details of their policies on pay on bonuses and the package details of anyone who earns more than the Prime Minister. Openness and transparency are the only ways to avoid another crisis like this one".

The bank figures will be closely watched for progress on lending to appease the chancellor, Alistair Darling, who is desperate to kick-start the economy. Barclays is expected to stress that it has already exceeded its self-imposed target to lend £11bn this year – in contrast to rivals which are claiming a lack of demand for lend.

Neither Barclays nor HSBC has taken any taxpayer money although the government is standing behind the banking system to a greater extent than in the past by facilitating money market operations.

The potential for big bonuses in the investment banking arms – founded mainly on buoyant trading in currency and bonds – comes as the government looks for ideas to keep pay under control. City minister Lord Myners told the BBC banks should name top earners outside boardrooms– a more draconian suggestion that the government's Walker review.

Myners also said that Sir Fred Goodwin, the former RBS chief executive, had told him last October that 200 bankers at the Edinburgh-based bank earned more than him before its near-collapse last year. Goodwin's base salary was £1.3m


Government's toxic asset insurance slowing economic recovery

City fears leaving asset protection scheme in limbo could damage growth

The government's programme to insure the toxic assets of partially nationalised banks is delaying an economic recovery and could cost the taxpayer £25bn, the Treasury has admitted.

Although the major banks will report huge writedowns on bad debts this week, the full picture may take many more months to emerge, as the long-delayed asset protection scheme has held up restructuring work on companies whose creditors include RBS and HBOS, part of Lloyds Banking Group. The government announced in February that it would insure £585bn of assets for the two bailed-out banks, but has yet to finalise details of the scheme.

City experts fear that leaving the scheme in limbo could damage recovery by leaving so-called "zombie" companies – those that are unprofitable but haven't been restructured or put into administration – in the market without being able to move on.

"As soon as the rules relating to the APS have been established, the government will be able to get on with the key task of helping the companies concerned return to a viable operation. The worst thing you can do is to do nothing – but I guess this is what's happening now," said David Lovett, the managing director at Alix Partners, an advisory firm.

Under normal circumstances, banks would restructure companies that fail to meet interest payments on their debts. They would typically agree a debt for equity swap, or extend or cancel some of the debt, recovering an average of between 60 and 70p for each pound of debt. But banks are expecting a much higher return on their debts under the insurance scheme, reducing the incentive to restructure a business.

Real estate firms and house builders, particularly hard-hit by the recession, have not been restructured as expected, leaving them in a kind of limbo, experts say. RBS and Lloyds are each exposed to £97bn of commercial real estate assets, BNP Paribas estimates.

Banks, in general, are keeping some of those loans as they want to minimise losses or writedowns through the asset protection scheme. "If you want to minimise your provisions, you can get situations where companies aren't properly fixed," said a leading restructuring adviser. McCarthy & Stone, Britain's biggest builder of retirement homes, is among those partially-restructured, a leading restructuring adviser said.

The company is now re-negotiating its banking covenants after a pre-packaged administration that left the company with as much as £500m of debt earlier this year. Setting new covenants was always part of the plan, the company argues, although specialists say the deal left too much debt in an uncertain market.

"Some people are more driven by wanting to minimise their provisions, rather than fixing the balance sheet properly," the adviser said.

The losses of the bailed-out banks are expected to rise when the APS starts working, as the banks will have to decide which assets need restructuring, and which ones will be put into administration.

The government's own provisions of £25bn related to potential losses on the programme were buried in page 109 of the Treasury's annual report, released last week. Some analysts estimate the figure could be much higher.

"The track record, based on the budget deficit and the borrowing numbers in the budget being too optimistic, would suggest this estimate is too conservative," said Alan Clarke, a UK economist at BNP Paribas, who estimates the scheme will cost taxpayers about £50bn.

Banks, advisers and potential buyers of distressed assets are still waiting for the final details of the scheme, which are not expected to be announced until later this summer at the earliest.

In the meantime, government advisers such as Citigroup and Credit Suisse are earning hefty fees. Top law firm Slaughter & May has already earned £22m in government advisory fees relating to guidance on the insurance scheme and the bail out of financial institutions, including Northern Rock, it emerged in June.

The work on HBOS' insured assets of £260bn is mostly done, but some areas in the RBS portfolio of £325bn have not been addressed, the person said.

"The APS has caused more of a wait and see attitude, rather than a pro-active one," said Tim Babich, managing partner of Fortelus, a hedge fund focused on distressed investments.

The banks deny any withholding on their assets, with RBS stressing that it has 700 staff handling bad loans – its so-called workout department. "It's in everyone's interests to help companies restructure," an RBS spokesman said. "We exist to work for our clients, and we want them to be clients over the long-term, not just the short term. We have also grown the restructuring team from around 150 to about 700 globally in the last couple of years, and they are all busy helping restructure companies."

RBS was Europe's biggest arranger of leveraged loans between 2006 and 2008. Its more than 250 deals represented about 10% of the market, followed by Deutsche Bank, which controlled about 6% of the leveraged loan market, according to Bloomberg data. Many of the RBS deals, such as those involving Martinsa Fadesa, a Spanish construction company, and Ferretti, an Italian yacht maker, have defaulted or needed a debt restructuring to avoid insolvency.

The Treasury says it is still working on the scheme, which will now be headed by former Credit Suisse banker Jeremy Bennett, it was reported yesterday. A Treasury spokesman said: "We are continuing to work with RBS and Lloyds on completing the final terms for the APS. We plan to formally notify the scheme to the European Commission soon."

The Treasury has also insisted it is making sure the scheme will not allow any sort of abuses.

No comments:

Post a Comment