Monday, June 04, 2007

Correo de Noticias al 4/6/07


http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2007/06/04/index.php?section=opinion&article=006o1pol

Astillero

Julio Hernández López

Partido papal

Acción Presidencial, PAP

Los niños de Los Pinos

Aires turbios en el DF

Como una especie de previo beso político en el anillo pontifical, Felipe de México ha convertido una agrupación espinalmente pecadora en todo un partido papal, el Partido Acción Presidencial, PAP, que hoy recibirá bendición y beneplácito en el Vaticano, mientras en la ciudad capital del reino de la Nueva España el nuncio recién designado, Christopher Pierre, estrena sus funciones diplomáticas con una visita de gobierno a la Basílica de Guadalupe y mientras el capellán del nuevo partido de los papistas, Norberto Rivera, expresa su apoyo celestial y terreno a dos funcionarios de la administración Ratzinger, el opusdeísta José Luis Soberanes, presidente de la Comisión Nacional del Santo Oficio, y el procurador Banamex, Eduardo Medina Mora, quienes han tenido a bien sacrificar sus obligaciones laicas para emprender acciones religiosas en contra de una decisión legislativa capitalina que amplió las posibilidades del aborto legal.

http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/columnas/65290.html

Estrictamente personal

Raymundo Riva Palacio

21 de mayo de 2007

James Bond en el Trópico

Las insuficiencias en la ley crean un vacío para que las fuerzas de seguridad puedan violar derechos humanos en la guerra contra el narco

En la semana de Pascua, Iván y Juan Carlos, hermanos de una política local en Sinaloa, bebían e inhalaban cocaína sentados en el garaje de su casa, con sus fusiles de asalto R-15, de uso exclusivo del Ejército reposando junto a ellos. Todo era normal para los estándares sociopolíticos de Culiacán, cuando de la nada, desde un automóvil comenzaron a dispararles. Ilesos, Iván y Juan Carlos fueron tras los agresores, en una persecución que dejó tres inocentes muertos en el camino y que sólo paró al acabárseles las balas. Cuando recargaban en su casa, los detuvo la policía local. Casi de inmediato llegaran cinco camionetas negras blindadas de agentes federales que exigieron se los entregaran. Si no nos los dan, amenazaron, aquí se quedan todos. Dos días después, los jóvenes aparecieron muertos.

http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2007/06/04/index.php?section=opinion&article=a04a1cul

Hermann Bellinghausen

Hacia un Estado penitenciario

El emergente Estado policiaco nos disgrega en islas de pensamiento crítico y resistencia, a la deriva en una real y ficticia marea de consumo y control que aspira a ahogarnos. Sus avances semejan esas manchas ectoplásmicas de petróleo que cubren y envenenan grandes extensiones de océano cuando un buque-tanque se perfora en el Pérsico, las costas de Galicia o el Golfo de México. El nuevo capítulo del proyecto capitalista crece, confiado en no encontrar oponentes de peso. No es mera alegoría comparar su táctica con la del huno Atila: donde pise no volverán a crecer los pastos.

http://www.am.com.mx/Yunque/Yunque.htm

BAJO EL GOBIERNO DEL YUNQUE

TOMAN YUNQUISTAS POSICIONES DE PODER

El gobernador Juan Manuel Oliva, su secretario de Gobierno, Gerardo Mosqueda, y el líder del Congreso local, Gerardo de los Cobos, son identificados como altos mandos del Yunque.

http://www.am.com.mx/Yunque/index2.htm

LAS IDEAS TIENEN CONSECUENCIAS...

Contrapunto en los valores de Acción Nacional y el Yunque

http://www.am.com.mx/Yunque/index.htm

ATACA EL YUNQUE A ALCALDES ’REBELDES’

http://www.am.com.mx/Yunque/index4.htm

ES MOSQUEDA JEFE REGIONAL

Asegura fundador del Yunque que el actual Secretario de Gobierno es uno de los altos jerarcas de la organización secreta; aportan más nombres de militantes infiltrados en el Gobierno del Estado.

http://www.am.com.mx/Yunque/index5.htm

ECHA RAICES ULTRA DERECHA

Hace casi 40 años, la organización del Yunque empezó a reclutar a jóvenes guanajuatenses; hoy, los integrantes de aquellas primeras células han llegado al poder en posiciones clave en el Gobierno del Estado y en el Congreso. Gerardo Mosqueda y Alberto Diosdado, secretarios de Gobierno y de Educación respectivamente, son señalados por sus ex compañeros como fundadores del grupo secreto de ultraderecha.

http://www.am.com.mx/Yunque/index6.htm

EXHIBEN AL YUNQUE AGENTES FEDERALES

Manuel Mora MacBeath/ a.m.

Durante el último año de Gobierno de José López Portillo, la extinta Dirección Federal de Seguridad (DFS) comprobó mediante una investigación la existencia de la Organización Nacional del Yunque y las actividades que desarrollaba en León.

http://www.am.com.mx/Yunque/index7.htm

INFILTRA EL YUNQUE AL PAN

Entre 1972 y 1974, Alfonso López Villalobos fue presidente del comité estatal del PAN, y fue testigo de cómo El Yunque se infiltró en ese partido; al principio –asegura- Elías Villegas odiaba al PAN porque consideraba que su fundador, Manuel Gómez Morín había sido masón.

http://www.am.com.mx/Yunque/index8.htm

EJERCE PODER GRUPO SECRETO

Según el investigador Álvaro Delgado, el Yunque ejerce el poder en Guanajuato, y da empleo en el Gobierno a los integrantes de la cofradía, sin importar su perfil o su capacidad. Dos destacados ex yunquistas coinciden en que se pervirtió el objetivo original de la organización secreta

http://www.am.com.mx/Nota.aspx?ID=140285

http://www.am.com.mx/Nota.aspx?ID=140573

http://www.am.com.mx/Nota.aspx?ID=140801

http://www.am.com.mx/Nota.aspx?ID=140985

http://www.am.com.mx/Nota.aspx?ID=141167

http://www.am.com.mx/Nota.aspx?ID=140976

http://www.am.com.mx/Nota.aspx?ID=140784

http://www.am.com.mx/Nota.aspx?ID=141467

http://www.am.com.mx/Nota.aspx?ID=140977

http://narcosphere.narconews.com/story/2007/5/31/202322/456

DOJ, DHS top brass implicated in House of Death cover-up, DEA testimony shows

By Bill Conroy,

Posted on Thu May 31st, 2007 at 08:23:22 PM EST

Rarely do we get a front row seat in the theater of power when the curtain is pulled back to reveal the set design as it is under construction.

http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/columnas/65500.html

Estrictamente personal

Raymundo Riva Palacio

04 de junio de 2007

Suerte echada

La derrota de la extrema derecha en la asamblea del PAN redefinirá política e ideológicamente al partido y al futuro de Calderón

A patadas, como llegaron al poder, comen zaron a ser echados. El repudio hacia Manuel Espino, presidente del PAN, y la derrota con la cual le arrebataron el control político del partido, no fue sólo el epílogo del final de su liderazgo, sino el preámbulo de una redefinición política e ideológica del panismo. Tras el rechazo a Espino del sector calderonista más radical en la asamblea de León y la caída en cámara lenta de sus cercanos, impedidos por el panismo nacional de entrar en el nuevo Consejo Político, Calderón logró recuperar el partido que habían perdido hace casi una década, y a su cabeza de playa más visible, Espino, comenzaron a desmontarlo como cuando se lucha contra alguien poderoso: cortándole las piernas, luego los brazos, y finalmente -lo que vendrá después- la cabeza.

http://revolucionesmx.blogspot.com/2007/06/hoy-hay-iglesia.html

domingo, junio 03, 2007

¿Hoy hay iglesia?

Sam García, REVOLUCIONES

DICE LA BIBLIA en Hechos capítulo 2 versículos 44 al 47:

“Todos los que habían creído estaban juntos, y tenían en común todas las cosas; y vendían sus propiedades y sus bienes, y lo repartían a todos según la necesidad de cada uno. Y perseverando unánimes cada día en el templo, y partiendo el pan en las casas, comían juntos con alegría y sencillez de corazón, alabando a Dios, y teniendo favor con todo el pueblo. Y el Señor añadía cada día a la iglesia los que habían de ser salvos.”

Desde la semana pasada pudimos conocer que el tema aborto sigue estando presente en los diarios nacionales para polarizar a nuestra sociedad mexicana. Hemos seguido de cerca, con la Biblia en la mano, la mala conducta y mal testimonio de los jerarcas católicos particularmente de Norberto Rivera. Incluso he señalado que otros representantes del cristianismo, también dejan mucho que desear. En ese sentido siendo neutrales, si analizamos de manera sencilla el pasaje de Hechos 2 podemos encontrar pocos ejemplos de comunidades que ponen por obra lo citado en tres versículos olvidados por los religiosos de ahora.

http://www.reforma.com/editoriales/nacional/776077/default.shtm

Miguel Ángel Granados Chapa

Reivindicación en Cofetel

Dos antiguas integrantes de la Comisión Federal de Telecomunicaciones, que en congruencia con sus convicciones criticaron la reforma y renunciaron a su cargo, ofrecieron al tribunal constitucional, como "amicus curiae", razones que reforzaron las de la minoría senatorial que impugnó la Ley Televisa

Aun antes de que concluya en la Suprema Corte el debate sobre la reforma a las leyes de telecomunicaciones y de radio y televisión, por sus varias significaciones conviene reparar en la única votación unánime (así sea de carácter preliminar) producida hasta ahora en la discusión del proyecto de sentencia preparado por el ministro Sergio Salvador Aguirre Anguiano, votación a la que él mismo se sumó en contra de su posición original, y que implica una suerte de reivindicación de cuatro antiguos miembros de la Comisión Federal de Telecomunicaciones.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6719507.stm

Nato condemns Putin missile vow

Russia's threat to aim weapons at Europe if the US sets up a missile defence shield there was "unhelpful and unwelcome", Nato has said.

http://www.voltairenet.org/article148772.html

Defensa: EEUU sigue provocando a Rusia

El escudo en Europa es como una declaración de guerra

por Noam Chomsky*

Tratad de imaginar cómo reaccionaría Norteamérica si Rusia, China, Irán o cualquier potencia extranjera osara sólo pensar en colocar un sistema de defensa de misiles en las fronteras de los EEUU o en sus aledaños, y no digamos si empezara a llevar a cabo ese plan. En tales circunstancias, de todo punto inimaginables, no sólo habría que esperar con certeza una violenta reacción norteamericana, sino que esa reacción resultaría también comprensible, por razones simples y claras.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6718205.stm

China climate stance challenges UK

China could soon overtake the US as the world's biggest polluter

China has said it will continue to prioritise economic development over tackling climate change. It is "neither realistic nor fair" to ask it to cut emissions, says Beijing.

In the UK, three more headline-worthy climate change "initiatives" have been unveiled. But are these kinds of measures enough?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/629/629/6528979.stm

Climate change around the world

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6720135.stm

Europe online '24 hours a month'

Surfing the net

Europeans are spending more time online

More than 122m Europeans aged 15 and above use the internet each day at home, school or in work, says a report.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6720459.stm

Brussels cleaning 'fraud' probed

European Commission Berlaymont building

The allegations come three months after another scandal over contracts

Investigators are studying claims that European Commission cleaning contracts were faked in a four-year fraud potentially worth millions of euros.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6717037.stm

Gorbachev criticises US 'empire'

Mikhail Gorbachev

Mr Gorbachev said relations between Blair and Putin had started well

The former Soviet leader, Mikhail Gorbachev, has blamed the US for the current state of relations between Russia and the West.

http://www.narconews.com/Issue46/article2685.html

Nancy Davies’ Book The People Decide: Oaxaca’s Popular Assembly Is Printed and Ready to Ship

A New Publisher of Books Reflects on How We Are Bypassing the Commercial Book Industry, and Offers some Special Packages to Readers and Bloggers

By Al Giordano

Publisher, Narco News

May 31, 2007

Only one year after Nancy Davies reported the first rumblings of the pro-democracy movement that shook Oaxaca and América in 2006, the story is now told in book form and available only to donors to The Fund for Authentic Journalism.

http://www0.mexico.indymedia.org/tiki-view_blog.php?blogId=78

El presidente de Sahuayo agrede a Martínez...

posteado por bolchevique en Jun 03, 2007 [01:29]

Durante esta semana, el pasado martes, para ser preciso, el director del periódico La Verdad, llegó a la penitenciaría de Sahuayo, a levantar la información de la nota roja para la edición del 3 de mayo, -según dijo a INDYMEDIA México- el director del medio independiente se encontraba allí,cuando de pronto aparece Fallo Ramírez, le habían hecho una llamada telefónica algún funcionario de la penitenciaría, así fue qué se presentó de improviso y como un energúmeno encaró a Jorge Martínez, quien fue obligado a entrar uno de una oficina de la penitenciaría, donde el presidente municipal le hizo un agriado reclamo sobre lo publicado en el periódico, allí el presidente enojado, atacó verbalmente a Jorge Martínez, delante de algunos uniformados y del director de la policía municipal. Como pudo, el director de La Verdad, tuvo que salir, después de una verdadera encerrona que le tendieron. Así se las guardan los presidentes municipales.

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB218/index.htm

DOCUMENTS LINKED TO CUBAN EXILE LUIS POSADA HIGHLIGHTED TARGETS FOR TERRORISM

Bomber's Confessions Point to Explosives Hidden in Toothpaste Tube that Brought Down Civilian Airliner in 1976

Judge Dismisses Immigration Fraud Charges on May 8; Indictment for terrorism crimes still possible

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003567129

'WSJ' Scoop: Ex-Wal-Mart Worker Details Surveillance of Employees

Published: April 04, 2007 12:45 PM ET

A fired Wal-Mart security worker confirmed a newspaper interview Wednesday in which he said he was part of a surveillance operation that spied on company workers, critics, shareholders and consultants. The company defended its security practices.

http://intellit.org/fbi_folder/fbi00s_folder/fbi00slennon.html

http://www.lennonfbifiles.com/

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Lennon Files

See http://www.lennonfbifiles.com/, maintained by Jon Wiener, author of Gimme Some Truth (2000).

http://www.eme-equis.com.mx/070MXWIKIPEDIA01.html

¡El Ataque Snack!

Por Nancy Millar

Películas, televisión, canciones, juegos. La cultura pop ahora viene empaquetada como galletas o papas fritas, en tamaño de una mordida y masticados rápidos. Es entretenimiento instantáneo, y vaya que es sabroso. De los ringtones a los bloglets, a los videojuegos de rápidos objetivos, el pasatiempo de hoy viene en pedacitos. Reporte del mundo de los medios de un minuto.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,2094699,00.html

Porn king offers $1m for US political sex scandal

· Hustler boss tries again to bring down big names

· Washington Post readers asked for revelations

Suzanne Goldenberg in Washington

Monday June 4, 2007

The Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/guantanamo/story/0,,2095376,00.html

Military judge throws out Guantánamo case

Suzanne Goldenberg in Washington

Monday June 4, 2007

Guardian Unlimited

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/04/us/politics/04bain.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin

Romney’s Fortunes Tied to Business Riches

By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK

Published: June 4, 2007

WASHINGTON, June 3 — Mitt Romney owes his nearly $350 million fortune and his political career to a delicate negotiation with his boss in the summer of 1983.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/article2611752.ece

The true value of what the G8 gives in aid

As leaders of the world's richest countries meet, this is the proof that they could do much more for the poor

By Paul Vallely

Published: 04 June 2007

There is something more morally binding about a promise when it is made by the rich to the poor. There is something altogether more shocking, therefore, when such a solemn pledge seems about to be broken.

Two years ago, the leaders of the rich world met at the G8 summit in Gleneagles and undertook to double annual aid to poor nations to $50bn (£25bn) a year. Half of that money was to go to the world's poorest people in Africa.

But on the eve of the latest G8 summit, in the Baltic resort of Heiligendamm in Germany this week, it is clear the rich world is well off track to deliver what the world's eight most powerful leaders signed up to after the biggest political lobby in history, a massive global campaign to make poverty history that culminated in 10 Live8 concerts watched by more than half the population of the world.

Overall aid to Africa has risen by less than half of what is needed to stay on track to reach the Gleneagles goal to double annual aid by 2010. A report by Oxfam yesterday suggested that, if present trends continue, the G8 will miss its target by a staggering $30bn.

Even the country which has done best in keeping its word, the UK, is projected to fall short of its promise of $14.9bn by $1.6bn. The country that has failed most so far, Italy, will be a whopping $8.1bn short of the $9.5bn it has vowed to give.

To those for whom such huge figures are meaningless, Oxfam offers some graphic illustrations. Last year, the rich world spent three times more on bottled water ($58bn) than it did on aid to Africa ($18bn). We spent 10 times more on military expenditure ($1trillion) than we did on aid globally ($104bn).

We Britons spent almost twice as much on champagne and other wine last year as we did on aid. The French spent more on perfume, German women more on shoes, Italians more on ice cream and the Japanese spent more on luxury goods such as Gucci bags and Prada sunglasses than their governments did on the world's poor.

Despite the Gleneagles promises, global aid actually fell in 2006 for the first time in 10 years. Aid to Africa has grown only 2 per cent since 2004.

"This is a very big potential shortfall," says the man who negotiated the Gleneagles deal from the British end, Lord Jay of Ewelme, who was then, as Sir Michael Jay, Head of the Diplomatic Service. He was the prime minister's personal representative, or sherpa, in the run-up to the summit.

His is the language of the Whitehall mandarin. He points out the caveats. Aid was down in 2006 because 2005 had been a bumper year. The quoted aid figures don't include the massive amounts of debt cancellation that were put through in 2006. Even so, the architect of Gleneagles concludes that, two years on, the outcome is "really disappointing".

Britain is the honourable exception here. Our aid budget, which is today nearly three times what it was 10 years ago, went up by a substantial 13 per cent last year, not including debt cancellations. But aid increased in France by just 1.4 per cent and in Germany by less than 1 per cent. Canada, Japan and the United States are all substantially down, according to the Oxfam figures. And Italy's aid budget has been slashed by a massive 30 per cent.

Will Heiligendamm change this? The word from inside the pre-summit negotiations is that Canada and Italy are being difficult. The current G8 president, Chancellor Angela Merkel, by contrast, on Friday announced a $750m boost to Germany's aid budget in 2008, with an extra $3bn over the next four years.

There are encouraging signs from Washington too. President Bush, who, surprisingly to many, has almost tripled American aid to Africa since he took office, has just announced his $15bn five-year President's Emergency Plan For Aids Relief (PEPFAR) will have its funding doubled from 2009.

"What is needed," says Lord Jay, "is to reconfirm the Gleneagles promises together with some specific undertakings on health and education programmes to put flesh on them."

That means rich nations must come up with the cash to fully fund the UN Education Fast Track Initiative by matching the $8.5bn the UK has pledged over the next 10 years. They need to pay into the replenishment of the Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria which falls due in September too. And they must make long-term commitments to support African governments' national plans on education and their strategies against Aids too.

In particular they need to scale-up initiatives that have already been shown to work. Thanks to the debt deal done at Gleneagles - which has written off $38bn so far, to 18 African countries - health care is now free in rural Zambia, says Oxfam, education is free for all children in Ghana, and Malawi is training 4,000 more teachers each year.

The Gleneagles promise on Aids has increased the number of Africans on anti-retrovirals tenfold. Some 1.3 million people - a quarter of those in need - are now receiving treatment, saving 250,000 lives last year. But, as Oxfam points out, 500,000 more could be saved if rich nations stump up $16.6bn more, as promised.

Angela Merkel's first summit as president of the G8 will be Tony Blair's last. "Personalities are hugely important," says Lord Jay. "I've been to four G8 summits and 17 European Councils and personal chemistry really does work. Bush is not going to want to come to Heiligendamm and spoil the party for Blair and Merkel, two leaders to whom for different reasons he's very close."

Some agreement has been reached already on what the final communiqué will say on international trade. But, in the end, a deal to make trade fairer for Africa can only be done at the world trade talks which come to their final crunch-point in mid June - which is just before President Bush's "fast-track authority" to agree a trade deal without the approval of the US Congress runs out.

What is needed at Heiligendamm is for G8 leaders to increase the trade talks momentum by approving a $4bn "aid for trade" package, agree 100 per cent market access for poor countries and more and flexible "Rules of Origin" that recognise the value added to products by Africans.

Lord Jay's successor and the other sherpas are still locked in negotiations. "It is always tough, the last couple of days before a summit," he says. "I was negotiating with my American sherpa colleague on my mobile phone and he was on the phone in Air Force One as they were landing in Edinburgh airport. That was the day before, with the final outcome still unclear."

So it is again, this time in Germany. The leaders there need to lift their heads from the detail to remember what is at stake.

To transform the lives of the world's poorest would cost the British government less than its citizens spend each year on celebrity magazines. The US could do it for the equivalent of what its people spend on nail varnish each year. The Germans with just half of what the nation spent last year on pet food.

In total all the richest nations need to provide is little more than $1 per citizen per year extra. That would be enough to fulfil their commitment to the world's poor. It is a trifling amount.

WHO GIVES WHAT?

* The British spend twice as much money on wine and champagne as Government does on aid

* German women shell out more on shoes than their Government spends on aid

* France's aid budget is dwarfed by the amount its women spend on perfume

* Spending by Japanese people on luxury goods is about the same as country's aid budget

* The amount the US gives in aid is less than the annual profits of the ExxonMobil oil company

* Italians spend more on ice cream than the country provides in overseas aid

* Canada's aid budget is only half the amount its people spend on beer

* Russia does not make figures available for the amount Moscow donates in aid or debt relief

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article2611736.ece

Sicko? The truth about the US healthcare system

Michael Moore's new film is a damning indictment of the way the world's richest country looks after those who fall ill. Andrew Gumbel finds out whether his accusations are justified

Published: 04 June 2007

Cynthia Kline knew exactly what was happening to her when she suffered a heart attack at her home in Cambridge, Massachusetts. She took the time to call an ambulance, popped some nitroglycerin tablets she had been prescribed in anticipation of just such an emergency, and waited for help to arrive.

On paper, everything should have gone fine. Unlike tens of millions of Americans, she had health insurance coverage. The ambulance team arrived promptly. The hospital where she had been receiving treatment for her cardiac problems, a private teaching facility affiliated with the Harvard Medical School, was just a few minutes away.

The problem was, the casualty department at the hospital, Mount Auburn, was full to overflowing. And it turned her away. The ambulance took her to another nearby hospital but the treatment she needed, an emergency catheterisation, was not available there. A flurry of phone calls to other medical facilities in the Boston area came up empty. With a few hours, Cynthia Kline was dead.

She died in an American city with one of the highest concentration of top-flight medical specialists in the world. And it happened largely because of America's broken health care system - one where 50 million people are entirely without insurance coverage and tens of millions more struggle to have the treatment they need approved. As a result, medical problems go unattended until they reach crisis point. Patients then rush to hospital casualty departments, where by law they cannot be turned away, overwhelming the system entirely. Everyone - doctors and patients, politicians on both the left and the right - agrees this is an insane way to run a health system.

When Elizabeth Hilsabeck gave birth to premature twins in Austin, Texas, she encountered another kind of insanity. Again, she was insured -- through her husband, who had a good job in banking. But the twins were born when she was barely six months pregnant, and the boy, Parker, developed cerebral palsy. The doctors recommended physical therapy to build up muscle strength and give the boy a fighting chance of learning to walk, but her managed health provider refused to cover it.

The crazy bureaucratic logic was that the policy covered only "rehabilitative" therapy - in other words, teaching a patient a physical skill that has been lost. Since Parker had never walked, the therapy was in essence teaching him a new skill and therefore did not qualify. The Hilsabecks railed, protested, won some small reprieves, but ended up selling their home and moving into a trailer to cover their costs. Elizabeth's husband, Steven, considered taking a new, better-paying job, but chose not to after making careful inquiries about the health insurance coverage. "When is he getting over the cerebral palsy?" a prospective new insurance company representative breezily asked the Hilsabecks. When Elizabeth explained he would never get over it, she was told she was on her own.

Everyone in America has a health-care horror story or knows someone who does. Mostly they are stories of grinding bureaucratic frustration, of phone calls and officials letters and problems with their credit rating, or of people ignoring a slowly deteriorating medical condition because they are afraid that an expensive battery of tests will lead to a course of treatment that could quickly become unaffordable.

Even when things don't go horribly wrong, it is a matter of surviving by the skin of one's teeth.

In Montana, Melissa Anderson can't find affordable insurance because she is self-employed - an increasingly common affliction. When her son Kasey came down with epilepsy two years ago, she was saved only by a recently introduced child health insurance programme specifically tailored to people who aren't poor but can't afford to pay monster medical bills. She herself remains uninsured for anything short of major care needs.

Over the past 15 years, the stories have become less about poor people without the economic means to access the system - although that remains a vast, unsolved problem - and more about the kind of people who have every expectation they will be taken care of. Middle-class people, people with jobs that carry health benefits or - as the problem worsens - people with the sorts of jobs that used to carry robust health benefits which are now more rudimentary and risk their being cut off for a variety of reasons.

This is the morass that Michael Moore has chosen to explore in his latest documentary, Sicko, which goes on release later this month. Moore spends much of the film demonstrating that there is nothing inevitable or necessary about a system that enriches insurance companies and drug manufacturers but shortchanges absolutely everyone else. His searching documentary looks at health care in France, Britain, Canada, and even Cuba - still regarded as a model system for the Third World.

Moore has his share of ghoulishly awful stories. The film kicks off with an uninsured carpenter who has to decide whether to spend $12,000 (£6,000) reattaching his severed ring finger or $60,000 to reattach his severed middle finger. Later on, Moore focuses on a hospital worker whose husband needed a bone marrow transplant to save him from a rare disease. The couple's insurance company refused to cover the transplant because it regarded the treatment as "experimental". The husband died.

Many more stories are collected in a newly published book called Sick: The Untold Story of America's Health Care Crisis, by Jonathan Cohn. A woman in California called Nelene Fox died of breast cancer after she, too, was turned down for a bone marrow transplant by her insurance company. In Georgia, a family whose infant son went into cardiac arrest were forced to take him to a hospital 45 miles away on their insurance carrier's orders. He survived, but suffered permanent disabilities that more prompt treatment might have averted. In New York, an infant called Bryan Jones - whose case was trumpeted all over the local media at the time - died of a heart defect that went undetected because his insurance company kicked him and his mother out of hospital 24 hours after his birth, too soon to carry out the tests that might have spotted the problem.

America's health system offers a tremendous paradox. In medical technology and in the scientific understanding of disease, it is second-to-none. Since doctors are better paid than anywhere else in the world, the country attracts the best of the best. And yet many, if not most, Americans are unable to reap the advantages of this. In fact, as The New York Times columnist Paul Krugman has argued, the very proliferation of research and high-tech equipment is part of the reason for the imbalance in coverage between the privileged few and the increasingly underserved masses. "[The system] compensates for higher spending on insiders, in party, by consigning more people to outsider status --robbing Peter of basic care in order to pay for Paul's state-of-the-art treatment," Krugman wrote recently. "Thus we have the cruel paradox that medical progress is bad for many Americans' health."

Having the system run by for-profit insurance companies turns out to be inefficient and expensive as well as dehumanising. America spends more than twice as much per capita on health care as France, and almost two and a half times as much as Britain. And yet it falls down in almost every key indicator of public health, starting, perhaps, most shockingly, with infant mortality, which is 36 per cent higher than in Britain.

A recent survey by the management consulting company McKinsey estimated the excess bureaucratic costs of managing private insurance policies - scouting for business, processing claims, and hiring "denial management specialists" to tell people why their ailment is not covered by their policy - at about $98bn a year. That, on its own, is significantly more than the $77bn McKinsey calculates it would cost to cover every uninsured American. If the government negotiated bulk purchasing rates for drugs, rather than allowing the pharmaceutical companies to set their own extortionate rates, that would save another $66bn.

Astonishingly, there hasn't been a serious debate about health care in the United States since Bill Clinton, with considerable input from his wife Hillary, tried and failed to overhaul the system in 1994. That, though, may be about to change as the 2008 presidential race heats up. Everyone acknowledges the system is broken. Everyone recognises that 50 million uninsured - including almost 10 million children - is unacceptable in a civilised society.

Even the old, classically American free-market argument - that "socialised" medicine is somehow the first step on a slippery slope towards godless communism - doesn't hold water, because in the absence of a functioning private insurance regime the government ends up picking up about 50 per cent of the overall costs for treatment anyway. The indigent rely on a government programme called Medicaid. The elderly have a government programme called Medicare. And perhaps the most efficient part of the whole system is the Veterans' Administration, a sort of NHS for former servicemen.

Rather like London and Paris in the 19th century, where the authorities belatedly paid attention to outbreaks of cholera once the disease started affecting the rich and middle classes, so the American health crisis may be coming to a head because of the kinds of people who are suffering from its injustices.

Corporate chief executives, for a start, are gagging under the ever-increasing costs of providing coverage to their employees. Starbucks now spends more on health care than it does on coffee beans. Company health costs, as a whole, are at about the same level as corporate profits. In a globalised world where US businesses are competing with low-wage countries such as India and China, that is rapidly becoming unacceptable.

That explains, perhaps, why the chief executive of Wal-Mart, Lee Scott, has made common cause with America's leading service sector union - more commonly a bitter critic of Wal-Mart's labour practices - in calling for a government-run universal health care system by 2012. It's going to be a tough battle. The insurance and pharmaceutical industries bankroll the campaigns of dozens of congressmen and have so far been brutally efficient in protecting their own interests. The Clintons were defeated in 1994 in part because of the power of the industry lobbies. Doing better this time will take singular political courage.

In the meantime, we will hear ever more crazy stories like the one told by Marijon Binder, a former nun in Chicago who ended up being sued by a Catholic hospital for $11,000 because her two-night stay for a heart scare was not considered a worthy charity case. Binder, who works as a live-in companion to a disabled old woman, wrote on all her admission forms that she had no insurance and, in her telling at least, was reassured the hospital would take care of her anyway.

After a year and a monstrous bureaucratic fight that went nowhere, a civil judge promptly absolved her of responsibility for her bill - a lucky outcome, for sure. Binder said: "The whole experience was very demeaning. It made me feel very guilty; it made me feel like a criminal." She is, though, alive and solvent. Not everyone in this system catches the same break.

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/article2611762.ece

Women can be as violent as men, says Lessing

By Thair Shaikh

Published: 04 June 2007

Doris Lessing, the novelist and feminist icon, said that women could be warmongers and as violent as men, in a speech yesterday.

Speaking at the Hay on Wye Festival, Lessing, 87, said that although history suggested women were peaceful, some of the worst crimes had been committed by females.

"There is a lot of sentimentality about women. We like to think that women are kind and motherly and are not going to go to war. But it's not true, is it?

"History suggests women are peace loving and law abiding - on the contrary some of the worst crimes have been committed by women," she said.

Promoting her latest novel, The Cleft, Lessing was asked by a woman in the audience how men could be stopped from constantly taking the world to war. "Well, I never noticed that women who get to be Prime Ministers are particularly peaceful!" she said, in what appeared to be a thinly veiled reference to Margaret Thatcher, the former Tory PM who was leader during the Falklands War.

Her latest book is about a mythical society free of males in which a member suddenly gives birth to a male.

As an author who has been strongly identified with feminism, her remarks are likely to offend many of her fellow female writers. However, Lessing has attacked feminists before - in a speech at the Edinburgh book festival in 2001, she defended men against what she called the "unthinking and automatic rubbishing" by feminists.

Lessing was born in Persia (now Iran) and was brought up in what was then Southern Rhodesia. She came to Britain in 1949 and became a feminist figurehead with her classics The Grass is Singing, a story set in colonial Africa, and The Golden Notebook, about a female writer's descent into madness. She went on to be shortlisted for the Booker Prize three times. In April she was nominated for the international version of the Booker Prize for fiction. And in 2001, she won the David Cohen literature prize for her lifetime's achievement.

No comments: