Tuesday, June 01, 2010


Robert Fisk: Western leaders are too cowardly to help save lives

It is a fact that it is ordinary people, activists, call them what you will, who now take decisions to change events

Has Israel lost it? Can the Gaza War of 2008-09 (1,300 dead) and the Lebanon War of 2006 (1,006 dead) and all the other wars and now yesterday's killings mean that the world will no longer accept Israel's rule?

Don't hold your breath.

You only have to read the gutless White House statement – that the Obama administration was "working to understand the circumstances surrounding the tragedy". Not a single word of condemnation. And that's it. Nine dead. Just another statistic to add to the Middle East's toll.

But it's not.

In 1948, our politicians – the Americans and the British – staged an airlift into Berlin. A starving population (our enemies only three years before) were surrounded by a brutal army, the Russians, who had erected a fence around the city. The Berlin airlift was one of the great moments in the Cold War. Our soldiers and our airmen risked and gave their lives for these starving Germans.

Incredible, isn't it? In those days, our politicians took decisions; our leaders took decisions to save lives. Messrs Attlee and Truman knew that Berlin was important in moral and human as well as political terms.

And today? It was people – ordinary people, Europeans, Americans, Holocaust survivors – yes, for heaven's sake, survivors of the Nazis – who took the decision to go to Gaza because their politicians and their statesmen had failed them.

Where were our politicians yesterday? Well, we had the ridiculous Ban Ki-moon, the White House's pathetic statement, and dear Mr Blair's expression of "deep regret and shock at the tragic loss of life". Where was Mr Cameron? Where was Mr Clegg?

Back in 1948, they would have ignored the Palestinians, of course. It is, after all, a terrible irony that the Berlin airlift coincided with the destruction of Arab Palestine.

But it is a fact that it is ordinary people, activists, call them what you will, who now take decisions to change events. Our politicians are too spineless, too cowardly, to take decisions to save lives. Why is this? Why didn't we hear courageous words from Messrs Cameron and Clegg yesterday?

For it is a fact, is it not, that had Europeans (and yes, the Turks are Europeans, are they not?) been gunned down by any other Middle Eastern army (which the Israeli army is, is it not?) there would have been waves of outrage.

And what does this say about Israel? Isn't Turkey a close ally of Israel? Is this what the Turks can expect? Now Israel's only ally in the Muslim world is saying this is a massacre – and Israel doesn't seem to care.

Video: Gaza aid ships violence condemned

But then Israel didn't care when London and Canberra expelled Israeli diplomats after British and Australian passports were forged and then provided to the assassins of Hamas commander Mahmoud al-Mabhouh. It didn't care when it announced new Jewish settlements on occupied land in East Jerusalem while Joe Biden, the Vice-President of its erstwhile ally, the United States, was in town. Why should Israel care now?

How did we get to this point? Maybe because we all grew used to seeing the Israelis kill Arabs, maybe the Israelis grew used to killing Arabs. Now they kill Turks. Or Europeans. Something has changed in the Middle East these past 24 hours – and the Israelis (given their extraordinarily stupid political response to the slaughter) don't seem to have grasped what has happened. The world is tired of these outrages. Only the politicians are silent.

Diplomatic storms

*Goldstone report, November 2009

Israel launched Operation Cast Lead in December 2008 with the declared aim of halting rocket fire from Gaza into Israel. More than 1,400 Palestinians were killed in the three-week conflict along with 13 Israelis. The South African jurist Richard Goldstone's report into the conflict found both Israel and the Hamas movement that controls the Strip guilty of war crimes, but focused more on Israel. Israel refused to co-operate with Goldstone and described his report as distorted and biased.

* The al-Mabhouh assassination, January-May 2010

Britain and Australia expelled Israeli diplomats after concluding that Israel had forged British and Australian passports used by assassins to kill a Hamas commander in Dubai. Israel has neither confirmed or denied a role in the killing of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in his hotel room in January. Britain said such misuse of British passports was "intolerable". Australia said it was not the behaviour of "a nation with whom we have had such a close, friendly and supportive relationship".

*Settlements row, March 2010

Israel announces plans, during visit by US Vice-President Joe Biden, to build 1,600 homes for Jews in an area of the West Bank annexed by Israel. The announcement triggers unusually harsh criticism from the United States. Washington said it damaged its efforts to revive the Middle East peace process. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the project was an insult. Netanyahu said he was blindsided by planning bureaucrats and apologised to Biden. Today's meeting with Barack Obama at the White House, called off by Mr Netanyahu so he could return home to deal with the flotilla crisis, was supposed to be another part of the fence-mending between the two allies.

*Nuclear secrecy, May 2010

Israel, widely assumed to have the Middle East's only nuclear arsenal, has faced renewed calls to sign a global treaty barring the spread of atomic weapons. Signatories of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) last week called for a conference in 2012 to discuss banning weapons of mass destruction throughout the Middle East. The declaration was adopted by all 189 parties to the NPT, including the US. It urged Israel to sign the NPT and put its nuclear facilities under UN safeguards.



La cobardía de los políticos
¿Ha perdido Israel su dominio en Medio Oriente? ¿Será posible que la guerra de Gaza de 2008-09 (mil 300 muertos), la guerra de Líbano en 2006 (mil 6 muertos) y todas las demás guerras, y ahora la matanza de ayer, signifiquen que el mundo ya no lo aceptará?

No contengan el aliento.

Basta leer la timorata declaración de la Casa Blanca: el gobierno de Obama trabaja para entender las circunstancias que rodean a la tragedia. Ni una sola palabra de condena. Eso es todo. Diecinueve muertos. Apenas una estadística más que añadir a la cuenta de Medio Oriente.

Pero no lo es.

En 1948, nuestros políticos –estadunidenses y británicos– lanzaron una incursión aérea de socorro sobre Berlín. Una población que moría de hambre (y que apenas tres años atrás era nuestra enemiga apenas tres años atrás) estaba rodeada por un ejército brutal, el ruso, que había erigido una muralla en torno a la ciudad. La incursión a Berlín fue uno de los grandes momentos de la guerra fría. Nuestros soldados y nuestros pilotos arriesgaron y dieron la vida por aquellos alemanes desfallecientes.

Increíble, ¿verdad? En aquellos días, nuestros políticos tomaban decisiones; nuestros líderes tomaban decisiones para salvar vidas. El primer ministro Attlee y el presidente Truman sabían que Berlín era importante en términos morales y humanos, no sólo políticos.

¿Y hoy? Personas comunes y corrientes –europeos, estadunidenses, sobrevivientes del Holocausto (sí, por Dios, de los nazis)– fueron quienes tomaron la decisión de ir a Gaza, porque sus políticos y estadistas les habían fallado.

¿Dónde estaban nuestros políticos este lunes? Bueno, tenemos al ridículo Ban Ki-moon, la patética declaración de la Casa Blanca, y la expresión de profundo pesar y conmoción por la trágica pérdida de vidas de nuestro querido señor Blair. ¿Dónde estaba Cameron? ¿Dónde estaba Clegg?

Allá en 1948, habrían desdeñado a los palestinos, por supuesto. Después de todo, es una terrible ironía que la incursión aérea en Berlín coincidiera con la destrucción de la Palestina árabe.

Pero es un hecho que personas ordinarias –llámenlos activistas, si quieren– son las que ahora toman decisiones para cambiar el curso de los acontecimientos. Nuestros políticos son demasiado endebles, demasiado cobardes para tomar decisiones que salven vidas. ¿Por qué ocurre esto? ¿Por qué este lunes no escuchamos palabras valerosas de Cameron y Clegg?

Porque es un hecho, sí o no, que si algunos europeos (y sí, los turcos son europeos, ¿o no?) hubieran sido asesinados por cualquier otro ejército de Medio Oriente (y eso es el ejército israelí, ¿o no?), entonces sí habría oleadas de indignación.

¿Y qué dice esto de Israel? ¿Acaso Turquía no es su aliada cercana? ¿Es esto lo que los turcos pueden esperar? El único país aliado de Israel en el mundo musulmán dice que ha sido una masacre… y a Tel Aviv parece no importarle.

Pero, bueno, tampoco pareció preocuparse cuando Londres y Canberra expulsaron a diplomáticos israelíes luego que se falsificaron pasaportes británicos y australianos y se entregaron a los asesinos de Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, comandante de Hamas. No le importó cuando anunció nuevos asentamientos judíos en tierra ocupada en Jerusalén oriental en momentos en que Joe Biden, el vicepresidente de su antiguo aliado, Estados Unidos, estaba en la ciudad. ¿Por qué habría de inquietarse ahora?

¿Cómo llegamos a este punto? Tal vez porque nos acostumbramos a ver a los israelíes matar árabes; tal vez los israelíes se acostumbraron a matar árabes. Ahora matan turcos. O europeos.

Pero algo ha cambiado en Medio Oriente en las 24 horas pasadas, y los israelíes (a juzgar por su extraordinariamente estúpida respuesta política a la matanza) no parecen haberse dado cuenta de ello. El mundo está cansado de estos hechos indignantes. Sólo los políticos callan.

© The Independent

Traducción: Jorge Anaya

No comments: