Sunday, June 20, 2010


Reforming the Markets

Setbacks for Merkel at the European Union Summit

By Carsten Volkery

German Chancellor Angela Merkel didn't get everything she wanted in  Brussels on Thursday.
Zoom
REUTERS

German Chancellor Angela Merkel didn't get everything she wanted in Brussels on Thursday.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel tried to put on a brave face at the end of the European Union summit on Thursday. But resistance to her proposals for reforming the markets is growing. The EU has failed to find a common position ahead of next week's G-20 summit in Toronto.

The European Union is becoming a little bit more German. That is perhaps the most important conclusion to be drawn following the one-day summit in Brussels on Thursday. In their communiqué, the 27 leaders pledged tougher savings measures and declared their willingness to share basic data on their national budgets with the EU for monitoring purposes. They also want to do more to increase transparency on the financial markets and, to that end, will publish the results of so-called stress tests performed on leading EU financial institutions.

Budgetary discipline has long been the Germans' hobbyhorse and Chancellor Angela Merkel appeared pleased after the summit. "The path to budget consolidation will be shared by all," she said in the press conference following the talks. She said that there was even a "feeling of togetherness" when the prime ministers of struggling EU members Spain and Portugal presented their austerity plans.

It was a moment that highlighted a marked shift in Europe over the past six months. The initial fear that the hesitant return to growth might be curbed by overzealous budgetary discipline has given way to the fear of rampant national debt. The debt crisis in southern Europe has acted as a catalyst. The change of government in Britain has also strengthened the budget hawks' hand.

Reflection of German Concerns

Any tightening of the Stability and Growth Pact will inevitably be regarded in Europe as a form of Germanization. No one has pushed harder than Berlin for the increased monitoring and inspection of budgets. The interim report by the task force on reforming the stability pact that EU Council President Herman van Rompuy presented at the summit is a detailed reflection of German concerns.

WHAT WAS DECIDED AT THE EU SUMMIT

New Sanctions against Iran

AP

European Union heads of state and government have agreed to increase sanctions against Iran. The new sanctions list includes a prohibition on new investments and technical assistance in the oil and natural gas sector. In addition, the list of products banned due to the possibility that they could also be used for military purposes has been extended. The EU is seeking to freeze assets belonging to members of the Revolutionary Guard and to broaden travel restrictions.

"Iran has not taken the many opportunities which have been offered to it to remove the concerns of the international community," the concluding paper reads. The new sanctions go beyond the recent steps taken by the United Nations.


Accession Negotiations with Iceland

Introduction of the Euro in Estonia

Financial Transaction Tax

Bank Levy

Stress Tests on European Banks

But this summit was anything but clear sailing for Merkel. On the second major issue, preparations for the G-20 summit, the chancellor encountered a serious setback. She had wanted to travel to Toronto next week with unanimous EU support for a bank levy and a global financial transaction tax. The levy plan envisions paying into a fund that would be tapped to cover the cost of future financial crises. The transaction tax, meanwhile, is intended to curb speculation on the financial markets.

Nebulous

But the German-French initiative came up against considerable resistance from other EU members. British Prime Minister David Cameron, who made his debut at a summit, blocked it together with his colleagues from the Czech Republic and Sweden. The discussion "wasn't so easy," Merkel said. In the end, they agreed to a push for "systems of levies and taxes" in Toronto that would see banks cover some of the costs in future crises. The details, however, remained nebulous.

The discussion over a financial transaction tax proved even tougher. Cameron avoided a direct confrontation with Merkel. He ultimately agreed to a vague formulation in the closing document which stated that the EU leaders are united in their desire to "research and develop" a global financial transaction tax. With that, Merkel is now able to state that there is a common EU position heading into the G-20 summit in Toronto. But she didn't convince Cameron.

Indeed, all it took was a single question from a journalist to show that the alleged compromise was pure window dressing. The journalist asked Merkel who, exactly, would "research" this tax. Her answer: "Of course the G-20, or the IMF, I don't know."

Most expect that the tax will be rejected at the G-20 summit, right along with the bank levy. A whole slew of countries -- including Canada, Japan, Australia, Brazil and China have already expressed their aversion to the proposal. Merkel has said that if they reject it, the EU will have to "assemble again" to consider going it alone without international support -- and likely without Britain and, perhaps, others as well.

Merkel's Budget Planning at Stake

For Merkel, the transaction tax is particularly important because the €2 billion a year in revenues it is expected to generate in Germany starting in 2012 have already been calculated into Berlin's budget planning. If the tax isn't implemented, then Merkel's government will be forced to find that money elsewhere.

Thursday's finger wrestling served as a reminder of why the idea of an economic government in the EU is still a distant one -- despite the rhetoric in the community about austerity measures. The debate over the Stability Pact is also still in the early stages, and the acid test won't come until October, when van Rompuy's working group presents its recommendations.

Only then will it become apparent which sanctions can be applied against EU member states and the degree to which Brussels can intervene on national budgetary policy. The details are still deeply contested. For the time being, a majority of the member states are rejecting the necessary change to the EU treaties. But Merkel believes they are necessary in order to threaten repeat deficit violators with sanctions like withdrawing their voting rights in the European Council, the body in the EU includes the heads of state and government of the 27 member states.

Merkel appeared exhausted at the end of the summit. She isn't, it would appear, just losing traction in Berlin. The European Union too looks to be slipping out of her grasp.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,701471,00.html

No comments: